read
articles
VIP Gavin Leech

VIP Gavin Leech

📝 ARTICLE INFORMATION

  • Article: VIP Gavin Leech
  • Person: Gavin Leech
  • Platform: https://www.gleech.org/
  • Date: October 16, 2025
  • Word Count: Approximately 1900 words

🎯 HOOK

Gavin Leech has spent over a decade building a cathedral of thought on his website, argmin gravitas, a place where rigorous analysis, interdisciplinary genius, and even poetry are forged into tools for understanding a complex world.

💡 ONE-SENTENCE TAKEAWAY

Gavin Leech’s work demonstrates that clear, rational thinking, when applied with humility and intellectual courage, is the most powerful tool for deconstructing flawed ideas and appreciating genuine excellence.

📖 SUMMARY

argmin gravitas is more than a blog; it is a meticulously curated archive of a mind in motion. Spanning over a decade, Gavin Leech’s website is a sprawling, systematic exploration of ideas, ranked by his own assessment of their importance and organized into a sprawling taxonomy of topics from AI safety to the philosophy of life. It is a project dedicated to building intellectual clarity from the ground up.

The core of Leech’s project is a relentless, constructive skepticism. He is a master at identifying the precise point where a elegant theory collides with messy reality. His classic post, “The Worst Game Ever,” tells a story from a corporate team-building event that becomes a perfect fable for the failure of game theory. He shows how a participant armed with a “clever false theory” (the textbook Nash equilibrium) led the entire group to ruin. The lesson is profound: a model is not a map, and using it in the wrong territory is a catastrophic error. This story encapsulates his entire method: use a sharp, concrete narrative to dismantle a widely held abstraction.

This skepticism is turned with equal force onto the institutions of knowledge themselves. “Why I’m not a philosopher” is a devastatingly polite dismantling of philosophy’s claims to utility. He argues that its function as an “intellectual janitor” is unproven and its ability to provide foundations is dubious. His conclusion is not arrogant but deeply humble: he is not confident he is in the “good tail” of philosophers who actually benefit the world. This willingness to walk away from a prestigious field, armed with reason, is a recurring theme.

Yet, Leech is not a destroyer but a connoisseur of what is truly great. He writes with immense admiration for figures like Frank Ramsey, the early-20th-century polymath who made foundational contributions to economics and philosophy before dying at 26. In Ramsey, Leech finds a model of the thinker he aspires to be: brilliant, yes, but also humane, jolly, and free of malice. This appreciation for genius extends to his analysis of culture. His 30,000-word essay on the video game Disco Elysium is a tour de force, hailing it as a work of “political fiction” more sophisticated than most books, a piece of art “smarter than themselves” that satirizes its own creators.

The sheer breadth of his work is staggering. His archive reveals deep dives into subjects as diverse as browser security (“Hardening the browser”), the nature of quality (“Why is quality rare?”), the economics of music (“streaming vs listening”), and a list of teenage geniuses throughout history (“acts of early genius”). He documents his own journey through a PhD with brutal honesty, providing a rare, unvarnished look at the realities of modern academia.

Crucially, the site also contains a section for Poems. The existence of this section is itself a vital piece of information. It reveals that the hyper-analytical mind that dissects game theory also has a mode of expression that is non-linear, emotional, and metaphorical. This suggests that for Leech, rationality and art are not opposing forces but complementary tools for perceiving reality. The poems are likely the workshop where he forges the metaphors and sensibilities that later appear in his analytical prose.

In his most recent work, he turns his lens to the technology of the moment, not with hype but with his signature critical distance. “How I don’t use LLMs” frames his interaction with AI as “couples counselling for me and my machine”, a perfect metaphor for maintaining agency and critical awareness in the face of powerful new tools. argmin gravitas is ultimately a guide to thinking in the age of information overload. It argues for a disciplined, eclectic, and deeply personal approach to building a worldview, one that is strong enough to critique the world but humble enough to appreciate its beauty.

🔍 INSIGHTS

Core Insights

  • The Duality of Rigor and Awe: Leech’s site embodies a fascinating duality. He applies the most rigorous logical analysis to subjects he clearly holds in deep awe, like Frank Ramsey or Disco Elysium. This shows that rationality and appreciation are not enemies; true understanding requires both.
  • The “Heavy Tails” of Impact: His analysis of philosophy and his celebration of figures like Ramsey reveal a core belief: impact is not normally distributed. A tiny number of people or ideas create the vast majority of value, and the key is to identify and learn from these “heavy tails.”
  • Self-Experimentation as a Method: His posts on grad school, his habits, and his use of AI are all forms of self-experimentation. He uses his own life as a laboratory to test ideas, providing a level of authenticity and evidence that is rare in intellectual writing.
  • Clarity as an Aesthetic and Ethical Choice: The site’s minimalist design and direct prose are not just functional. They represent a deep-seated belief that thinking clearly and communicating clearly are fundamental virtues. The tagline “No cookies, you’re not that interesting” is a perfect expression of this ethos.

How This Connects to Broader Trends/Topics

  • The Effective Altruism and Rationalist Movements: Leech is clearly a product of and a contributor to these movements, sharing their focus on quantitative reasoning, interdisciplinary thinking, and using evidence to try to do good in the world.
  • The Crisis of Institutions: His critiques of academia and philosophy resonate with a broader cultural skepticism toward traditional institutions and a search for more independent, reliable sources of knowledge.
  • AI Safety and Alignment: His research interests and critical writing on AI place him squarely in the middle of the most important conversation of our time: how to ensure advanced technology benefits humanity.

🛠️ FRAMEWORKS & MODELS

Leech’s work demonstrates a powerful framework for intellectual discovery, which we can call The Leech Method:

  1. Survey the Territory: Identify a field, concept, or work of art. Read widely, including both its proponents and its best critics. (Evidence: His extensive references and reading lists).
  2. Stress-Test the Model: Take the central theory or claim and push it to its logical extreme or apply it in a hostile environment. Look for the point where it breaks. (Evidence: “The Worst Game Ever,” “Why I’m not a philosopher”).
  3. Identify the Latent Function: If the theory or work succeeds, analyze why it succeeds. Look for the hidden mechanism, the unstated assumption, or the “elevating false framework” that makes it work. (Evidence: His analysis of Disco Elysium).
  4. Synthesize a Heuristic: Distill the lesson into a simple, portable rule or model for future thinking. (Evidence: His takeaway from the game theory story, his admiration for Ramsey’s thinking style).
  5. Express in Multiple Modes: Explore the insight through both analytical prose and, if possible, poetic or metaphorical language to fully integrate its meaning. (Evidence: The coexistence of his posts and poems).

💬 QUOTES

  1. “It is really amazing how stupidly a clever person can act if they are relying on a clever false theory. This can result from any method, any species of reasoning, but using maths badly is the most complete way of disabling such a person.” (From “The Worst Game Ever”)

    • Significance: This is the central warning of his entire project. It’s a powerful, memorable statement about the dangers of abstraction detached from reality, a theme he returns to again and again.

  2. “the median philosophy degree does nothing for the world. But the tails are heavy.” (From “Why I’m not a philosopher”)

    • Significance: This quote is the epitome of his thinking style. It uses a concept from statistics to make a nuanced, precise, and powerful point about a complex human endeavor, avoiding both naive praise and blanket condemnation.

  3. “They made something smarter than themselves, they satirise their own too. This can happen!” (From “‘Disco Elysium’ (2019): Part 1”)

    • Significance: This captures his capacity for intellectual joy and awe. It shows his belief in the possibility of transcendence through collaborative creation and his appreciation for things that exceed the sum of their parts.

  4. “My picture of the world is drawn in perspective, and not like a model to scale. The foreground is occupied by human beings and the stars are all as small as threepenny bits.” (From Frank Ramsey, quoted in “Ramsey”)

    • Significance: He chooses this quote to highlight the humanism at the core of his intellectual heroes. It reveals his own value system, where human thought, love, and experience are the proper scale against which to measure the universe.

⚡ APPLICATIONS

For readers seeking to apply Leech’s methods:

  • Master Your Models: For any belief you hold, write down its core assumptions. Then, actively search for real-world scenarios where those assumptions are false. This is the best way to understand the limits of your knowledge.
  • Cultivate “Good Taste”: Don’t just consume content; actively curate it. Identify the thinkers, artists, and ideas that you believe are in the “heavy tail” of impact. Study them intensely to understand what makes them great.
  • Practice Intellectual Humility: When you form a strong opinion, immediately ask yourself: “What would change my mind?” If you can’t answer, you haven’t thought about it enough.
  • Find Your Poetic Form: Even if you don’t write poetry, find a mode of expression that is not purely analytical. This could be through music, visual art, or simply metaphorical journaling. It will open up different ways of knowing.

📚 REFERENCES

  • Primary Sources: The author’s own extensive body of work, including posts, poems, and research, which serves as the main evidence for this analysis.
  • Key Thinkers Referenced: Frank Ramsey, Ludwig Wittgenstein, David Lewis, WVO Quine, Robert Kurvitz, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, Simon Reynolds.
  • Key Works Analyzed: Disco Elysium, foundational texts in economics and analytic philosophy, various AI research papers.
  • Methodological Influences: His work is in direct conversation with the rationalist and effective altruism communities, while also drawing on traditions of analytic philosophy and economic modeling.

⚠️ QUALITY & TRUSTWORTHINESS NOTES

  • Accuracy Check: The content is a faithful representation of the author’s extensive published work. His use of confidence ratings and explicit sourcing enhances its factual accuracy.
  • Bias Assessment: The content is transparently shaped by the author’s strong rationalist, analytical, and independent-thinking perspective. This is a feature, not a flaw, as it is applied consistently and with self-awareness.
  • Source Credibility: As the primary source, the author’s credibility is built on the logical rigor, originality, and intellectual honesty consistently demonstrated over more than a decade of public writing.
  • Transparency: The site is exceptionally transparent, with clear authorship, a self-ranked importance system, open revision of past views, and a stark, no-tracking design.
  • Potential Harm: None. The content is intellectually demanding but promotes critical thinking, intellectual humility, and a more reasoned approach to complex problems.

Find more of his work at: https://www.gleech.org/ | @gleech on X

Crepi il lupo! 🐺